Art Trends In The 1920s :: Art

Art Trends In The 1920's The art of the 20th century contained many elements previous styles that had begun in the late 19th century. The Impressionists had abandoned the appearance of nature to concentrate on color and its relation to the quality of light. (Collier's Encyclopedia, 745) This was then abandoned for a kind expressionism, a personal and subjective style created. A number of outstanding 20th century artists working outside the many movements of art created works of great individuality. (Collier's Encyclopedia, 745) Some major trends of the art in the 1920's were Impressionism, Art Deco, Cubism, Abstract Art, and Realism. Impressionism is the movement in painting and music. The impressionist movement is often considered to mark the beginning of the modern period in art. The primary object is to achieve a spontaneous, undetailed rendering of the world through careful representation of the effect of natural light on objects. ("Impressionism", Encarta) Art Deco, was used primarily in furniture, jewelry, textiles, and interior decoration. Art Deco grew out of a conscious effort to simplify the elaborate of the century, Art Nouveau. Art Deco became more geometric and linear as objects increasingly massed produced. Art Deco was a style of decorative are and architecture that was popular in the 1920's. ("Art Deco", Encarta) Cubism, a movement in modern art, especially painting, that was primarily concerned with abstract forms rather than lifelike representation. ("Cubism", Encarta) Abstract Art, is art that uses forms having no direct reference to external or perceived reality. ("Abstract Art", Encarta) Realism, in art is an attempt to describe human behavior and surroundings or to represent figures and objects exactly as they appear in life. ("Realism", Encarta) There were many types of art in the 1920's, but the main ones were Impressionism, Art Deco, Cubism, Abstract Art, and Realism.

Marketing Case

Management-to get to the profit I believe you have to have some good management behind a business. If you have a business and the management is not solid or unrecognized or nonexistent a business cannot run smoothly, therefore putting profit at risk for that business. Meaning the economic perspective cannot stand alone. 2. Customer Service- a business should always operate with the consumers in mind considering they are the ones who will generate profit for the business. If good customer service Is not involved in business, Just like good management, profit will not exist.Meaning the economic perspective cannot stand alone. 3. Supply and demand- a business has to think are we supplying what the consumers want or is demanded in order to make a profit. If you have a business selling things that are not needed or not wanted then surely u will not have profit. Meaning the economic perspective cannot stand alone. 4. Inventory- a business should offer operate with Inventory In mind If ther e aren't enough Inventories In a market people will go elsewhere to find it. Meaning the economic perspective cannot stand alone. . Marketing (image) – if a business cannot lure people in how is your profit going to be made. A business should also think about marketing has well or has a stepping stone to make a profit. Meaning the economic perspective cannot stand alone. A businesses general goal should be to make a profit but I do not feel that they should only operate with a profit In mind, because there are several factors that can get you to making a profit. A) Was Home Depot's behavior an act of good ethics or simply shrewd business?Imagine how an executive would argue in a meeting for the actions that the company kook. What objections might other executives raise? Believe that although Home Depot increased the price before hand I still see their behavior has an act of good ethics. The executives would argue in a meeting that In a time such as these that It's Just supply and demand. They raised prices knowing that people would come in to purchase these materials to protect their investments. 1 OFF Unlike price gouging Tanat seems to napped rater an Incident or at ten last nor Ana the prices go up extensively.Other executives might argue that they raised prices just at the right time to avoid really being looked at has price gouging. B) Would it make any difference in this case whether a decision maker takes a short -term or long-term view? Which view should the decision maker take? It would make a difference on whether a decision maker takes a long term or short term view. If you look at it from long term Home Depot made a smart business decision to increase their prices, they increased profits therefore in the future will be making more profits. In the short term they lost out on the profits that came from price gouging.I think the decision maker should take the view of short term and that I believe that they kept ethical in their businesses. C) D oes Home Depot (or any other Business) have a responsibility to help the citizens hurt by the hurricane? Whose responsibility is hurricane relief? I feel it's good business to help citizens hurt by the hurricane all it can do is make that business look very good to the public but I feel it is not their responsibility to and in hurricane relief it's the insurance companies and the owners responsibilities and if the situation is bad enough maybe the government

The Necklace A Brilliant Tale By Guy de Maupassant - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 3 Words: 957 Downloads: 6 Date added: 2019/08/02 Category Literature Essay Level High school Tags: The Necklace Essay Did you like this example? The Necklace Guy de Maupassants short story, The Necklace, occurs in 1884, Paris, France. This was the 19th century, commonly referred to as the Belle. Society was divided into social groups based on wealth. Marriage was considered if the within their social class or higher and women relied on men financially. The Necklace was brilliantly written in simple form exposing evidence of literary realism. The story revolves around Mathilde, a woman who was discontented with where life had placed her, lower-middle class. Mathilde suffered ceaselessly, feeling herself born to enjoy all delicacies and all luxuries (Maupassant, 1884, para. 3). She had no way of being understood, being known by societies members and [ ] married by any rich and distinguished man (1). She lowered her standards and married a man who she thought was beneath her. He worked for the Ministry of Public Instruction. Mathildes Loisel husband seems to be quite content with their average life unlike Mathilde, doing everything he could to please her. She continuously daydreamed of dainty dinners, of shining silverware and she thought of delicious dishes served on marvelous plates (5), for she would have loved to be envied, to be longed for, to be desired. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "The Necklace: A Brilliant Tale By Guy de Maupassant" essay for you Create order When there is no change of a character throughout the entire story, it is defined as a static character and a character that is extremely realistic is described as round. Of course, this all touches on the feelings of the whole story, especially the climax, and is extremely dependent on how the author builds up the characters. Maupassant does an excellent job of describing Mathildes character, who was habitually unhappy with her life and always wanting more. When characters are portrayed as self-absorbed and greedy, they usually make bad choices or decisions in the heat of conflict. This is clearly shown in Mathildes character. The theme that this story reveals is greed and pride. When Mathildes husband comes home one evening with an invitation to the ball, he was excited to it give Mathilde because this was an exclusive gathering, instead, she threw the invitation on the table crossly, (10), and asked in a dreadful tone as to what she was to do with it? Mathilde revealed her selfishness and self-centeredness by these actions, never once expressing gratitude for receiving the invitation or joining in with her husbands excitement. She proceeds with exclaiming how she did not have anything to wear. Having no jewelry, and not wanting to look poverty-stricken (12), she states, I would almost rather not go at all. (12). Her friend, Madame Forestier loaned her [ ] a superb diamond necklace [ ] which Mathilde wore to the ball. Men stared at her, asked her to dance, and asked her name. It was Mathildes night of fame, her night to shine. She was intoxicated with pleasure and delight by the attention and recognition she received. But grief was soon arriving. She discovered that the necklace was missing from her neck! Mathilde and her husband looked for hours, and to their dismay, never finding it. She did not tell Madame Forestier that she had lost her necklace. Instead, she and her husband took out loans to replace the necklace and, in the end, spent ten years paying loans off, which put them in further hardship. The necklace and Mathildes attitude were the antagonists of this story. They also both are symbols of her greed and are prime illustrations of how destructive they can become. Guy De Maupassant clearly emphasizes this in The Necklace. As the story continues, Mathilde, the protagonist, takes on a new appearance to her character, as she must wash dishes, and laundry to help pay for the replacement necklace after the original was lost. Mathildes role almost changed to a woman of oppression with heroism, making the reader think that she may be a bit humbled by her insistence of wearing a borrowed diamond necklace. It makes me wonder if she ever realizes to its true capacity how selfish she really is and how giving her husband is. The readers perceive Mathildes poverty through her eyes, to seem underprivileged and poor, only to get worse after the loss of the necklace. Drastic changes in their lives took place such as, economical lodging, making the life they had before obtaining the necklace looking pretty good compared to the life they have now. The moral of Maupassants short story, The Necklace, is to be happy and appreciate the things you have. Do not be envious. Mathildes pride stopped her from revealing the loss of necklace and wanting more than she had. Mathilde Loisel is displeased with her life. She is self-absorbed with no regard for her husband and the thoughts of wanting to be wealthy, has consumed her. Life is composed of the most unpredictable, disparate, and contradictory elements, according to Guy de Maupassant. The ending of the story is a shocker when news of the necklaces value is disclosed as paste or fake. The Loisels spent ten years paying more of a price than monetary. Descriptive and colorful writing is conducted eloquently by Guy de Maupassant in this short story giving his readers a sense of being there, that he is talking directly to us. He clearly illuminates his characters, giving vivid mental pictures of each. However, I wonder if Mathilde finally appreciates the life she had with her husband before the necklace. I wonder if Mathilde will ever understand what her husband gave up for her, before the necklace and after. I wonder if she will ever understand that she was the key player to her misery. I also wonder what happened with both Mathilde and her husband when they found out the truth about the necklaces value? This is an excellent story about greed and pride and how it affects individuals and everything around them.